Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />presumption that you all arc going to place in your proposal is that the tenant will be <br />removing all their equipment in accordancc to DERM regulations. So when you get <br />there, the presumption is that all of that has been taken can' of. So that when DERM <br />sees it, they al'c not going to have a problem. There is on 151 Sunny Isles Boulevard, a <br />dry c1eancr and it is in fuIl operation. <br /> <br />22. Will you require a Performance Bond? <br />Yes, Performance and Payment Bond. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />23. A Bid Bond? <br />]\0. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />24. Will you elaborate on the situation with 151 and 215 Sunny Isles Boulevard and the <br />possibility that Harbour Construction may be awarded those two pursuant to a previously <br />entered legal agreement between the City and the Gold Club? Taking it a step further, <br />presumably ifthey are the low bidder on those two, they are going to do them? They already <br />have an agreement with you. <br />The RFP states that the demolition ofthcse h\o properties may be awarded to Harbour <br />Construction pursuant to a settlement agreement as described in the RFP. However, <br />even ifthose two demolitions arc given to Harbour Construction, the successful bidder <br />could still be awarded the remaining four buildings to be demolished. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />25. What 1 am getting at is that it takes a lot of effort to put this together, if they are going to get <br />it anyway, why bother? <br />1\ly job is to put out there a Request for Proposal, and what it says here is a portion of <br />the services can be provided for 151 and 215 Sunny Isles Boulevard to Harbour <br />Construction, and that you all acknowledge that the City may award a portion of the <br />services, and it says specifically ie. the demolition of 151 and 215 to Harbour <br />Construction pursuant to an agreement. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />26. So the worst case scenario the demo contractor breaks down the sites? <br />\Ve actually broke them down because there were different dates that the tenants have <br />to be out, and that is why we put in the dates. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />27. I have a question about the trees as well. First we assume that all the trees are to be <br />removed, and put a boundary survey together and there is a possibility that a few may stay <br />per DERM, but we are not to assume that DERM is going to say not to remove them? <br />In your proposal, every thing is getting fl'moved. \\ hen DER:\'1 comes back and says <br />that we need to replace in-kind tre(~s, for example you have a certain size. when you do <br />a tree disposition plan as part of the survey. they arc going to say the size of the trunk <br />and the spread of the canopy. DERVI comes back and docs a little rough number as to <br />how many plants arc fl'quired to replace that one tree. When DERM docs that. that is <br />a time and material to you all. So your proposal is going to take into consideration, <br />tree remo\ al. It is a little bit easier for you, I don't intend for you to kno\\ the equation <br />by heart and try to figure out those things. so that will be time and material. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />28. Are we allowed to visit the sites? <br />Yes, they arc open and available if you want to go by there. WASD \ isit to be <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />11-07-03 Pre-Submittal Conference Qi\ 072011.Joc <br /> <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />