My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Target Engineering Group
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(12-06-01) Construction Management for Gateway Park
>
Responses
>
Target Engineering Group
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2012 11:46:34 AM
Creation date
6/14/2012 11:36:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Construction Management Svcs for Gateway Park
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
12-06-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I I <br />Target Engineering C8X09 TOW 10 1 Interval.txt <br />i command =__> <br />I <br />r <br />I PF1 =Help PF3= Process /Exit PF7 =Page Back PF8 =Page Forward PF12 =Cmd. <br />Line I <br />I B. Issue ]identification and Resolution(weight =0.14) <br />page 5 I <br />I 1. Acted proactively when identifying issues by working with <br />I <br />various stakeholders including utilities, cities, counties and <br />I <br />the Contractor so as to minimize time and cost overruns. <br />5 I <br />2. Conducted thorough analysis of issues including a review of <br />I <br />I various alternative solutions with enough detail and back -up to <br />I <br />I show logic behind alternatives. Provided documentation for time <br />I <br />i and cost impacts as required by CPAM. <br />4 I <br />3. Made decisions appropriate with authority and based these <br />I <br />decisions on solid logic and enough supporting detail to <br />I <br />i demonstrate a well- researched effort. Decisions /recommendations <br />consistent with the analysis. <br />4. Resolved issues in a timely manner so as to eliminate and /or <br />4 <br />f minimize time and cost impacts to the project. Escalated issues <br />I <br />to the Department only when efforts towards resolution had <br />I <br />reached an impasse, the issues were beyond the consultant's <br />I authority, or when project delays could result. <br />4 I <br />i <br />f <br />` Issue Total 17 / # of Tests 4 X0.14 = Issue & Resolution GRADE: <br />I <br />0.59 <br />r+------------------------------------_------------------------------------- <br />- - - - -+ <br />+CONSULTANT CEI(CCEI) WORK PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ----------- Obs 8917 screen 6 -+ <br />command = = => <br />I <br />PF1 =Help PF3 = Process /Exit PF7 =Page Back PF8 =Pa a Forward PF12 =Cmd. <br />Line I <br />i Issue Identification and Resolution(continued3 <br />page 6 1 <br />I Notes: <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'t� <br />� <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I I <br />I I <br />- - - - -+ <br />�J <br />l+------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />+CONSULTANT CEI(CCEI) WORK PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ----------- Obs 8917 Screen 7 -+ <br />command = = => <br />I <br />PF1 =Help PF3 = Process /Exit PF7 =Page Back PF8 =Page Forward PF12 =Cmd. <br />Line I <br />I C. Communication and Coordination (weight =0.12) <br />page 7 I <br />i <br />I 1. Provided necessary project information to all project <br />I <br />I stakeholders. <br />4 1 <br />I 2. used an established system to track communications. <br />4 <br />f <br />I 3. scheduled, held, and documented the Pre - Construction <br />I Conference, the Monthly scheduling Meetings, and the Progress <br />Meetings(i.e. Submittals, RFI's, Progress /schedule, MOT, <br />I <br />Utilities, CPPR, Outstanding Issues and Claims). <br />4 <br />4. Notified Department immediately of issues impacting schedule <br />I <br />and costs. <br />4 <br />I 5. Documented oral communications in Daily Reports, logs, or <br />i_ <br />Page 3 <br />�J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.