My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Calvin Giordano & Assoc.
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(12-06-01) Construction Management for Gateway Park
>
Responses
>
Calvin Giordano & Assoc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2012 12:02:34 PM
Creation date
6/14/2012 11:51:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Construction Management Svcs for Gateway Park
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
12-06-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />RFQ #12‐06‐01, Construction Management Services for Gateway Park Page 4| 6 <br />How will inspections be performed? Using a standard checklist? Using the specifications themselves <br />(quality assurance criteria), etc.? The more generalized and vague the inspection procedures are, the more <br />likely they will not be consistently effective. However, not having a checklist is not a cause for disapproving <br />a QC plan unless a checklist is specifically required. <br />The CQCP should minimize any parroting or paraphrasing of requirements in the contract, and should <br />avoid simply promising to comply with the contract. These kinds of statements and assurances are of <br />essentially no added value. The CQCP must go beyond the contract requirements and address the <br />contractor's organizational process for consistently delivering those requirements. <br />Subcontractors and Suppliers <br />When subcontractors and suppliers provide part of the work, then the QCP needs to be clear whether their <br />QC responsibilities will be independent or a part of the prime contractor's responsibilities. If they are <br />independent, then the subcontractors or suppliers QCP must be developed and submitted for approval, <br />through the prime. Otherwise, the prime must address how it will monitor and verify <br />subcontractor/supplier quality as a part of its plan. In either case the prime is contractually responsible for <br />all the work, but being contractually responsible is not the same as having an active role in the quality <br />delivery process. <br />Manufactured Materials <br />An important part of the CQCP is the process for verifying that manufactured materials comply with the <br />requirements of the contract. Materials inspection will subject to the quantity of materials provided per <br />category. <br />Records and Documentation <br />While good documentation is often a reflection of good quality control, documentation is not the same <br />thing as quality control. Documentation should be the minimum necessary to concisely document the <br />adequate function of the process. As‐built survey documentation will be provided based on the <br />requirements of the Contract Documents. <br />Personnel Qualifications <br />While some contracts may have specific required qualifications for contractor quality control and testing <br />personnel, the initial judgment as to whether a given person is or is not qualified is generally left to the <br />contractor. However, during contract administration, CGA may be more assertive in monitoring the <br />qualifications of these personnel. When the contract has specific experience requirements, the contractor <br />should describe how the person's previous training and experience addresses these requirements. <br />Contractor Evaluation <br />Evaluations are made of five individual elements, plus an overall evaluation: <br /> Quality of Work <br /> Timely Performance <br /> Effectiveness of Management <br /> Compliance With Labor Standards <br /> Compliance With Safety Standards <br />The first of these five elements, Quality of Work, essentially overlaps the contractor's inspection system <br />requirements. That is, a contractor that fails to maintain an effective quality control (inspection system) <br />will generally warrant an unsatisfactory rating in the Quality of Work category. Deficient contractors must <br />be clearly notified of the deficiencies and provided an opportunity to correct them.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.