My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Add No 1
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 14-11-01 NE 174th St. Roadway Improvements
>
Add No 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2017 4:14:46 PM
Creation date
6/14/2017 4:04:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Justification For Request For Substitution <br /> <br />a. In making a request for substitution, the CONTRACTOR represents that <br />CONTRACTOR has investigated the proposed substitution and has <br />determined that it is equal or superior to that specified; that the <br />CONTRACTOR will provide equal to or better warranties or bonds for the <br />proposed substitution as for the product or method specified, that the <br />CONTRACTOR waives claims for additional costs or extension of time <br />related to the proposed substitution that may subsequently become <br />apparent. <br /> <br />3.03 ENGINEER'S OPTIONS <br /> <br />A. Requests for substitutions may be rejected by the ENGINEER without further <br />review if the request: <br /> <br />1. Is received more than thirty (30) days after the date of the Notice To <br />Proceed. <br /> <br />2. Effects the project completion date. <br /> <br />3. Jeopardizes the performance or the intent of the project. <br /> <br />4. Requires substantial revision of the Contract Documents. <br /> <br />B. Requests will not be accepted that are indicated or implied on shop drawings <br />and are not accompanied by a formal request for substitution by the <br />CONTRACTOR. <br /> <br />C. If the ENGINEER determines that a proposed substitute meets the <br />requirements of the Contract Documents and is suitable for the purpose <br />intended, it may be accepted and if accepted, reimbursement to the OWNER for <br />the Engineer's review will not be required. <br /> <br />D. If the ENGINEER determines that a proposed substitute does not meet the <br />requirements of the Contract Documents and is not acceptable, furnish the <br />specified product, manufacturer or method at no additional cost to the OWNER <br />and shall reimburse the OWNER for the cost of the Engineer's review. <br /> <br />E. If the ENGINEER determines that a proposed substitute does not meet the <br />requirements of the Contract Documents as specified but is suitable as a <br />substitute for the purpose intended: <br /> <br />1. Reimburse the OWNER for the Engineer's review. <br /> <br />2. Furnish the product, manufacturer or method specified at no additional <br />cost to the OWNER. <br /> <br />City of Sunny Isles Beach <br />NE 174th Street Roadway Improvements <br />01630 - 4 Product Substitution Procedures <br />14-1758 / 09-19-2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.